← Gear database

Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Brooks Cascadia 17

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Bedrock Sandals Rockhound is the lighter option — 432 g lighter than the Brooks Cascadia 17 (69% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Bedrock Sandals Rockhound Brooks Cascadia 17
Weight 198 g · 0.198 kg · 0.44 lb 630 g · 0.630 kg · 1.39 lb
Brand Bedrock Sandals Brooks
Category Footwear Footwear
Bedrock Sandals Rockhound
198 g

Adjustable flip-flop sandal with Vibram soles, G-hook-and-loop strap, and 3D+ footbed. Zero drop, 19mm stack height. First flip-flop in Bedrock's lineup, availa...

Full details →
Brooks Cascadia 17
630 g

Versatile trail shoe with rock plate and DNA Loft cushioning.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Brooks Cascadia 17: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Bedrock Sandals Rockhound wins — at 198 g it is 432 g (69%) lighter than the Brooks Cascadia 17 (630 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest footwear page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More footwear comparisons

Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Mountain Laurel Designs Superlight Gaiter Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Dirty Girl Gaiters Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Mayfly Imago Sandals Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Injinji Trail Midweight Mini-Crew Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Darn Tough Micro Crew Lightweight Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Ultralight Mindset Adventure Sandals