← Gear database

Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Bedrock Sandals Rockhound is the lighter option — 71 g lighter than the Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe (26% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Bedrock Sandals Rockhound Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe
Weight 198 g · 0.198 kg · 0.44 lb 269 g · 0.269 kg · 0.59 lb
Brand Bedrock Sandals Saucony
Category Footwear Footwear
Bedrock Sandals Rockhound
198 g

Adjustable flip-flop sandal with Vibram soles, G-hook-and-loop strap, and 3D+ footbed. Zero drop, 19mm stack height. First flip-flop in Bedrock's lineup, availa...

Full details →
Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe
269 g

Lightweight trail running shoe at 9.5oz per shoe. Enhanced traction with Vibram outsole and aggressive tread pattern.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Bedrock Sandals Rockhound wins — at 198 g it is 71 g (26%) lighter than the Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe (269 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest footwear page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More footwear comparisons

Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Dirty Girl Gaiters Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Mayfly Imago Sandals Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Injinji Trail Midweight Mini-Crew Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Darn Tough Micro Crew Lightweight Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Ultralight Mindset Adventure Sandals Bedrock Sandals Rockhound vs Darn Tough Hiker Boot Midweight