Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles vs Salomon MTN Carbon S3

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Salomon MTN Carbon S3 is the lighter option — 96 g lighter than the Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles (29% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.

Spec	Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles	Salomon MTN Carbon S3
Weight	336 g · 0.336 kg · 0.74 lb	240 g · 0.240 kg · 0.53 lb
Brand	Black Diamond	Salomon
Category	Trekking Poles	Trekking Poles

Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles

336 g

Collapsible carbon fiber trekking poles with FlickLock Pro adjustability. Foam grip with extended grip zone for varied terrain; sold as a pair.

Check price Full details →

Salomon MTN Carbon S3

240 g

Foldable carbon trail running poles with Quick Lock.

Full details →

Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles vs Salomon MTN Carbon S3: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Salomon MTN Carbon S3 wins — at 240 g it is 96 g (29%) lighter than the Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles (336 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons

Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles vs Leki Ultratrail FX.One Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles vs Komperdell Carbon FXP UL Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles vs Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Pole Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles vs Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Poles Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles vs Leki Neotrail Pro FX.One Superlite 115cm Black Diamond Distance Carbon FLZ Trekking Poles vs Gossamer Gear LT5