← Gear database

Brooks Cascadia 17 vs Salomon Thundercross

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Salomon Thundercross is the lighter option — 340 g lighter than the Brooks Cascadia 17 (54% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Brooks Cascadia 17 Salomon Thundercross
Weight 630 g · 0.630 kg · 1.39 lb 290 g · 0.290 kg · 0.64 lb
Brand Brooks Salomon
Category Footwear Footwear
Brooks Cascadia 17
630 g

Versatile trail shoe with rock plate and DNA Loft cushioning.

Full details →
Salomon Thundercross
290 g

Versatile trail running shoe with aggressive Contagrip lugs and a Quicklace system for grip and security on technical trails.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Brooks Cascadia 17 vs Salomon Thundercross: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Salomon Thundercross wins — at 290 g it is 340 g (54%) lighter than the Brooks Cascadia 17 (630 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest footwear page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More footwear comparisons