← Gear database

Brooks Cascadia 19 vs Mammut Aenergy Trail Endurance Ultra

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Brooks Cascadia 19 is the lighter option — 17 g lighter than the Mammut Aenergy Trail Endurance Ultra (5% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Brooks Cascadia 19 Mammut Aenergy Trail Endurance Ultra
Weight 303 g · 0.303 kg · 0.67 lb 320 g · 0.320 kg · 0.71 lb
Brand Brooks Mammut
Category Footwear Footwear
Brooks Cascadia 19
303 g

Versatile trail running shoe with rock plate, DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, and multi-directional TrailTack rubber outsole. Men's US size 9 per shoe weight.

Full details →
Mammut Aenergy Trail Endurance Ultra
320 g

Lightweight trail running shoe designed for mid-to-long distance runs and hiking. Features Vibram Megagrip outsole and FLEXTRON PRO plate for technical terrain.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Brooks Cascadia 19 vs Mammut Aenergy Trail Endurance Ultra: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Brooks Cascadia 19 wins — at 303 g it is 17 g (5%) lighter than the Mammut Aenergy Trail Endurance Ultra (320 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest footwear page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More footwear comparisons