← Gear database

Brooks Cascadia 19 vs Oboz Katabatic LT Mid GTX

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Brooks Cascadia 19 is the lighter option — 52 g lighter than the Oboz Katabatic LT Mid GTX (15% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Brooks Cascadia 19 Oboz Katabatic LT Mid GTX
Weight 303 g · 0.303 kg · 0.67 lb 355 g · 0.355 kg · 0.78 lb
Brand Brooks Oboz
Category Footwear Footwear
Brooks Cascadia 19
303 g

Versatile trail running shoe with rock plate, DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, and multi-directional TrailTack rubber outsole. Men's US size 9 per shoe weight.

Full details →
Oboz Katabatic LT Mid GTX
355 g

One of the lightest waterproof midweight hiking boots at just 1 lb 9.6 oz per pair (355g per shoe) with excellent traction and support.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Brooks Cascadia 19 vs Oboz Katabatic LT Mid GTX: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Brooks Cascadia 19 wins — at 303 g it is 52 g (15%) lighter than the Oboz Katabatic LT Mid GTX (355 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest footwear page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More footwear comparisons