Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe vs Lowa Alpine Pro GTX

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe is the lighter option — 1,054 g lighter than the Lowa Alpine Pro GTX (82% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.

Spec	Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe	Lowa Alpine Pro GTX
Weight	226 g · 0.226 kg · 0.50 lb	1,280 g · 1.280 kg · 2.82 lb
Brand	Brooks	Lowa
Category	Footwear	Footwear

Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe

226 g

Lightweight performance trail shoe with Trailtrack multi-surface outsole. Agile geometry for fast movement; weight per shoe in men's US 9.

Check price Full details →

Lowa Alpine Pro GTX

1,280 g

Technical mountaineering boot for demanding terrain.

Full details →

Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe vs Lowa Alpine Pro GTX: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe wins — at 226 g it is 1,054 g (82%) lighter than the Lowa Alpine Pro GTX (1,280 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest footwear page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More footwear comparisons

Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe vs Dirty Girl Gaiters Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe vs Injinji Trail Midweight Mini-Crew Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe vs Darn Tough Micro Crew Lightweight Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe vs Darn Tough Hiker Boot Midweight Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe vs Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed 2 Brooks Catamount Agil Trail Running Shoe vs Norda 005