BRS 3000T vs UCO Spork

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

UCO Spork is the lighter option — 11 g lighter than the BRS 3000T (39% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.

Spec	BRS 3000T	UCO Spork
Weight	28 g · 0.028 kg · 0.06 lb	17 g · 0.017 kg · 0.04 lb
Brand	BRS	UCO
Category	Cooking	Cooking

BRS 3000T

28 g

Titanium ultralight canister stove weighing just 28g. Compact collapsible design fits inside a fuel canister. Compatible with Lindal valve canisters.

Check price Full details →

UCO Spork

17 g

Classic titanium spork. The ultralight cutlery staple.

Full details →

BRS 3000T vs UCO Spork: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the UCO Spork wins — at 17 g it is 11 g (39%) lighter than the BRS 3000T (28 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest cooking page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More cooking comparisons

BRS 3000T vs Sea to Summit Alpha Light Spork BRS 3000T vs Keith Ti Spork BRS 3000T vs BRS 3000T Ultralight Titanium Stove BRS 3000T vs BRS 3000T Ultra-Light Titanium Stove BRS 3000T vs BRS-3000T Ultra Light Stove BRS 3000T vs BRS 3000T Ultra-Light Stove