← Gear database

BRS-3000T Canister Stove vs Decathlon Forclaz MT900 Ultralight Stove

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

BRS-3000T Canister Stove is the lighter option — 22 g lighter than the Decathlon Forclaz MT900 Ultralight Stove (44% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec BRS-3000T Canister Stove Decathlon Forclaz MT900 Ultralight Stove
Weight 28 g · 0.028 kg · 0.06 lb 50 g · 0.050 kg · 0.11 lb
Brand BRS Decathlon
Category Cooking Cooking
BRS-3000T Canister Stove
28 g

Ultra-compact titanium canister stove weighing just 28g. 9,000 BTU output, boils 1L in approx. 3.5 minutes. Folding legs and igniter. Bestselling budget ultrali...

Full details →
Decathlon Forclaz MT900 Ultralight Stove
50 g

Compact ultralight canister stove designed for backpackers seeking minimal weight. Reliable performance for boiling water and basic cooking on multi-day trips.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

BRS-3000T Canister Stove vs Decathlon Forclaz MT900 Ultralight Stove: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the BRS-3000T Canister Stove wins — at 28 g it is 22 g (44%) lighter than the Decathlon Forclaz MT900 Ultralight Stove (50 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest cooking page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More cooking comparisons

BRS-3000T Canister Stove vs Sea to Summit Alpha Light Spork BRS-3000T Canister Stove vs Keith Ti Spork BRS-3000T Canister Stove vs UCO Spork BRS-3000T Canister Stove vs BRS 3000T Ultralight Titanium Stove BRS-3000T Canister Stove vs Grayl Titanium Camp Stove BRS-3000T Canister Stove vs Fire Maple FMS-300T Titanium Stove