← Gear database

BRS-3000T Stove vs Fire-Maple Blade 2

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

BRS-3000T Stove is the lighter option — 110 g lighter than the Fire-Maple Blade 2 (81% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
Spec BRS-3000T Stove Fire-Maple Blade 2
Weight 25 g · 0.025 kg · 0.06 lb 135 g · 0.135 kg · 0.30 lb
Brand BRS Fire-Maple
Category Cooking Cooking
BRS-3000T Stove
25 g

One of the world's lightest canister stoves at 25g. Standard isobutane/propane canister compatibility with foldable pot supports and compact profile.

Check price Full details →
Fire-Maple Blade 2
135 g

Ultralight remote-canister stove with a copper preheat tube for steady high-output flame in freezing conditions. Outputs 2.8kW for cold-weather camping.

Check price Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

BRS-3000T Stove vs Fire-Maple Blade 2: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the BRS-3000T Stove wins — at 25 g it is 110 g (81%) lighter than the Fire-Maple Blade 2 (135 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest cooking page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More cooking comparisons