← Gear database

Durston Gear Iceline Carbon Trekking Poles (pair) vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles is the lighter option — 60 g lighter than the Durston Gear Iceline Carbon Trekking Poles (pair) (22% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Durston Gear Iceline Carbon Trekking Poles (pair) Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles
Weight 269 g · 0.269 kg · 0.59 lb 209 g · 0.209 kg · 0.46 lb
Brand Durston Gear Freevane
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
Durston Gear Iceline Carbon Trekking Poles (pair)
269 g

Exceptionally light carbon trekking poles tested among the lightest available. Fixed length carbon construction optimized for ultralight trekking and shelter se...

Full details →
Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles
209 g

Ultralight carbon fiber poles at 209g per pole. Excellent strength-to-weight ratio.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Durston Gear Iceline Carbon Trekking Poles (pair) vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles wins — at 209 g it is 60 g (22%) lighter than the Durston Gear Iceline Carbon Trekking Poles (pair) (269 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons