← Gear database

Durston Iceline Trekking Poles vs Komperdell Carbon FXP UL

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Komperdell Carbon FXP UL is the lighter option — 68 g lighter than the Durston Iceline Trekking Poles (25% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Durston Iceline Trekking Poles Komperdell Carbon FXP UL
Weight 268 g · 0.268 kg · 0.59 lb 200 g · 0.200 kg · 0.44 lb
Brand Durston Komperdell
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
Durston Iceline Trekking Poles
268 g

World's lightest adjustable trekking poles at 134g per pole. Premium high-strength carbon, 16mm tip, external clamp adjustment.

Full details →
Komperdell Carbon FXP UL
200 g

Foldable ultralight carbon trekking poles.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Durston Iceline Trekking Poles vs Komperdell Carbon FXP UL: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Komperdell Carbon FXP UL wins — at 200 g it is 68 g (25%) lighter than the Durston Iceline Trekking Poles (268 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons

Durston Iceline Trekking Poles vs Fizan Compact 3 Durston Iceline Trekking Poles vs Gossamer Gear FT3 Trekking Poles Durston Iceline Trekking Poles vs Leki Ultratrail FX.One Durston Iceline Trekking Poles vs Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Pole Durston Iceline Trekking Poles vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles Durston Iceline Trekking Poles vs Diorite Telescopic Carbon Fiber Poles