← Gear database

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs UCO Spork

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

UCO Spork is the lighter option — 118 g lighter than the Fire-Maple Blade 2 (87% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
Spec Fire-Maple Blade 2 UCO Spork
Weight 135 g · 0.135 kg · 0.30 lb 17 g · 0.017 kg · 0.04 lb
Brand Fire-Maple UCO
Category Cooking Cooking
Fire-Maple Blade 2
135 g

Ultralight remote-canister stove with a copper preheat tube for steady high-output flame in freezing conditions. Outputs 2.8kW for cold-weather camping.

Check price Full details →
UCO Spork
17 g

Classic titanium spork. The ultralight cutlery staple.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs UCO Spork: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the UCO Spork wins — at 17 g it is 118 g (87%) lighter than the Fire-Maple Blade 2 (135 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest cooking page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More cooking comparisons

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs Sea to Summit Alpha Light Spork Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs Keith Ti Spork Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs BRS 3000T Ultralight Titanium Stove Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs BRS 3000T Ultra-Light Titanium Stove Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs BRS-3000T Ultra Light Stove Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs BRS 3000T Ultra-Light Stove