← Gear database

Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles is the lighter option — 107 g lighter than the Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles (34% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles
Weight 316 g · 0.316 kg · 0.70 lb 209 g · 0.209 kg · 0.46 lb
Brand Fizan Freevane
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles
316 g

Ultralight collapsible trekking poles at 316g per pair (5.6oz each), fully adjustable 23-52 inches with strong aluminum construction.

Full details →
Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles
209 g

Ultralight carbon fiber poles at 209g per pole. Excellent strength-to-weight ratio.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles wins — at 209 g it is 107 g (34%) lighter than the Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles (316 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons