← Gear database

Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles vs Salomon MTN Carbon S3

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Salomon MTN Carbon S3 is the lighter option — 76 g lighter than the Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles (24% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles Salomon MTN Carbon S3
Weight 316 g · 0.316 kg · 0.70 lb 240 g · 0.240 kg · 0.53 lb
Brand Fizan Salomon
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles
316 g

Ultralight collapsible trekking poles at 316g per pair (5.6oz each), fully adjustable 23-52 inches with strong aluminum construction.

Check price Full details →
Salomon MTN Carbon S3
240 g

Foldable carbon trail running poles with Quick Lock.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles vs Salomon MTN Carbon S3: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Salomon MTN Carbon S3 wins — at 240 g it is 76 g (24%) lighter than the Fizan Compact 3 Trekking Poles (316 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons