← Gear database

Fizan Compact 3 vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Fizan Compact 3 is the lighter option — 51 g lighter than the Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles (24% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fizan Compact 3 Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles
Weight 158 g · 0.158 kg · 0.35 lb 209 g · 0.209 kg · 0.46 lb
Brand Fizan Freevane
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
Fizan Compact 3
158 g

Ultralight aluminum trekking poles at 5.6 ounces each. Adjustable 22.8-52 inches with EVA grips.

Full details →
Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles
209 g

Ultralight carbon fiber poles at 209g per pole. Excellent strength-to-weight ratio.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fizan Compact 3 vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Fizan Compact 3 wins — at 158 g it is 51 g (24%) lighter than the Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles (209 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons