← Gear database

Fjallraven Keb Trousers vs Sea to Summit Ultra-Sil Sack 4L

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Sea to Summit Ultra-Sil Sack 4L is the lighter option — 756 g lighter than the Fjallraven Keb Trousers (97% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fjallraven Keb Trousers Sea to Summit Ultra-Sil Sack 4L
Weight 780 g · 0.780 kg · 1.72 lb 24 g · 0.024 kg · 0.05 lb
Brand Fjallraven Sea to Summit
Category Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Fjallraven Keb Trousers
780 g

Durable G-1000 trekking trousers. Can be waxed for water resistance.

Full details →
Sea to Summit Ultra-Sil Sack 4L
24 g

Ultralight stuff sack for food, clothing or sleeping bag.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fjallraven Keb Trousers vs Sea to Summit Ultra-Sil Sack 4L: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Sea to Summit Ultra-Sil Sack 4L wins — at 24 g it is 756 g (97%) lighter than the Fjallraven Keb Trousers (780 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest miscellaneous page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More miscellaneous comparisons