← Gear database

Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10 vs Osprey Exos 38

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10 is the lighter option — 310 g lighter than the Osprey Exos 38 (26% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
Spec Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10 Osprey Exos 38
Weight 880 g · 0.880 kg · 1.94 lb 1,190 g · 1.190 kg · 2.62 lb
Brand Forclaz Osprey
Category Backpack Backpack
Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10
880 g

Decathlon ultralight thru-hiking backpack with 50+10L capacity, roll-top closure and removable components for paring down trail weight.

Check price Full details →
Osprey Exos 38
1,190 g

Ultralight ventilated multi-day pack with AirSpeed suspended mesh backpanel and removable top lid for fast-and-light backpacking.

Check price Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10 vs Osprey Exos 38: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10 wins — at 880 g it is 310 g (26%) lighter than the Osprey Exos 38 (1,190 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons