← Gear database

Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down vs Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm is the lighter option — 755 g lighter than the Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down (91% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm
Weight 830 g · 0.830 kg · 1.83 lb 75 g · 0.075 kg · 0.17 lb
Brand Forclaz Yamatomichi
Category Sleep System Sleep System
Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down
830 g

700 fill power RDS down mummy-style sleeping bag with 90% duck down. Ideal for 3-season trekking with anatomical hood and adjustable footbox. 5°C comfort rating...

Full details →
Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm
75 g

Ultralight closed-cell foam sleeping pad, 100cm length, one of the world's lightest sleep pads at just 75g with minimalist ultralight design

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down vs Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm wins — at 75 g it is 755 g (91%) lighter than the Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down (830 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest sleep system page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More sleep system comparisons

Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down vs Sea to Summit Aeros Ultralight Pillow Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down vs Sea to Summit Aeros Ultralight Pillow (Regular) Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down vs NEMO Fillo Elite Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down vs Nemo Fillo Elite Wide UL Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down vs Nemo Equipment Tensor Elite Ultralight Forclaz Trek MT900 5°C Down vs NEMO Equipment Tensor Elite Sleeping Pad