← Gear database

Freevane Panther Trekking Poles vs Komperdell Carbon FXP UL

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Komperdell Carbon FXP UL is the lighter option — 12 g lighter than the Freevane Panther Trekking Poles (6% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Freevane Panther Trekking Poles Komperdell Carbon FXP UL
Weight 212 g · 0.212 kg · 0.47 lb 200 g · 0.200 kg · 0.44 lb
Brand Freevane Komperdell
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
Freevane Panther Trekking Poles
212 g

Five-segment folding carbon poles with high stiffness-to-weight ratio for packable trekking.

Full details →
Komperdell Carbon FXP UL
200 g

Foldable ultralight carbon trekking poles.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Freevane Panther Trekking Poles vs Komperdell Carbon FXP UL: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Komperdell Carbon FXP UL wins — at 200 g it is 12 g (6%) lighter than the Freevane Panther Trekking Poles (212 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons

Freevane Panther Trekking Poles vs Fizan Compact 3 Freevane Panther Trekking Poles vs Gossamer Gear FT3 Trekking Poles Freevane Panther Trekking Poles vs Leki Ultratrail FX.One Freevane Panther Trekking Poles vs Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Pole Freevane Panther Trekking Poles vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles Freevane Panther Trekking Poles vs Diorite Telescopic Carbon Fiber Poles