← Gear database

Fuel Can vs SOTO WindMaster Stove with TriFlex

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

SOTO WindMaster Stove with TriFlex is the lighter option — 33 g lighter than the Fuel Can (33% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fuel Can SOTO WindMaster Stove with TriFlex
Weight 100 g · 0.100 kg · 0.22 lb 67 g · 0.067 kg · 0.15 lb
Brand Fuel SOTO
Category Cooking Cooking
SOTO WindMaster Stove with TriFlex
67 g

Windproof canister stove with MicroRegulator technology for consistent output in cold weather. Includes foldable TriFlex pot support.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fuel Can vs SOTO WindMaster Stove with TriFlex: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the SOTO WindMaster Stove with TriFlex wins — at 67 g it is 33 g (33%) lighter than the Fuel Can (100 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest cooking page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More cooking comparisons

Fuel Can vs Sea to Summit Alpha Light Spork Fuel Can vs Keith Ti Spork Fuel Can vs Trail Designs Kojin Stove Fuel Can vs UCO Spork Fuel Can vs BRS 3000T Ultralight Titanium Stove Fuel Can vs BRS-3000T Canister Stove