← Gear database

Komperdell Carbon FXP UL vs Trekkology Trek-Z 2.0

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Komperdell Carbon FXP UL is the lighter option — 340 g lighter than the Trekkology Trek-Z 2.0 (63% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Komperdell Carbon FXP UL Trekkology Trek-Z 2.0
Weight 200 g · 0.200 kg · 0.44 lb 540 g · 0.540 kg · 1.19 lb
Brand Komperdell Trekkology
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
Komperdell Carbon FXP UL
200 g

Foldable ultralight carbon trekking poles.

Full details →
Trekkology Trek-Z 2.0
540 g

Foldable aluminum trekking poles at 540g (110-135cm). Aerospace grade 7075 aluminum with flip-lock mechanism.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Komperdell Carbon FXP UL vs Trekkology Trek-Z 2.0: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Komperdell Carbon FXP UL wins — at 200 g it is 340 g (63%) lighter than the Trekkology Trek-Z 2.0 (540 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons

Komperdell Carbon FXP UL vs Leki Neotrail Pro FX.One Superlite (120cm pair) Komperdell Carbon FXP UL vs Fizan Compact 3 Komperdell Carbon FXP UL vs Gossamer Gear FT3 Trekking Poles Komperdell Carbon FXP UL vs Leki Ultratrail FX.One Komperdell Carbon FXP UL vs Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Pole Komperdell Carbon FXP UL vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles