← Gear database

MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon vs Salomon MTN Carbon S3

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Salomon MTN Carbon S3 is the lighter option — 242 g lighter than the MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon (50% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon Salomon MTN Carbon S3
Weight 482 g · 0.482 kg · 1.06 lb 240 g · 0.240 kg · 0.53 lb
Brand MSR Salomon
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon
482 g

Foldable Kevlar-reinforced carbon backcountry poles with 20cm of tool-free DynaLock adjustability for all-season use.

Check price Full details →
Salomon MTN Carbon S3
240 g

Foldable carbon trail running poles with Quick Lock.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon vs Salomon MTN Carbon S3: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Salomon MTN Carbon S3 wins — at 240 g it is 242 g (50%) lighter than the MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon (482 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons

MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon vs Leki Ultratrail FX.One MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon vs Komperdell Carbon FXP UL MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon vs Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Pole MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon vs Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Poles MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon vs Leki Neotrail Pro FX.One Superlite 115cm MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon vs Gossamer Gear LT5