← Gear database

NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions vs Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm is the lighter option — 407 g lighter than the NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions (84% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm
Weight 482 g · 0.482 kg · 1.06 lb 75 g · 0.075 kg · 0.17 lb
Brand NEMO Yamatomichi
Category Sleep System Sleep System
NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions
482 g

Four-season insulated air pad delivering an 8.5 R-value at just 17oz. Among the lightest extremely well-insulated backpacking pads. Regular mummy.

Full details →
Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm
75 g

Ultralight closed-cell foam sleeping pad, 100cm length, one of the world's lightest sleep pads at just 75g with minimalist ultralight design

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions vs Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Yamatomichi UL Pad 100cm wins — at 75 g it is 407 g (84%) lighter than the NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions (482 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest sleep system page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More sleep system comparisons

NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions vs Sea to Summit Aeros Ultralight Pillow NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions vs Sea to Summit Aeros Ultralight Pillow (Regular) NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions vs NEMO Fillo Elite NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions vs Nemo Fillo Elite Wide UL NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions vs Nemo Equipment Tensor Elite Ultralight NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions vs NEMO Equipment Tensor Elite Sleeping Pad