← Gear database

Salomon MTN Carbon S3 vs Trekology Trek-Z 2.0 Trekking Poles

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Salomon MTN Carbon S3 is the lighter option — 300 g lighter than the Trekology Trek-Z 2.0 Trekking Poles (56% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Salomon MTN Carbon S3 Trekology Trek-Z 2.0 Trekking Poles
Weight 240 g · 0.240 kg · 0.53 lb 540 g · 0.540 kg · 1.19 lb
Brand Salomon Trekology
Category Trekking Poles Trekking Poles
Salomon MTN Carbon S3
240 g

Foldable carbon trail running poles with Quick Lock.

Full details →
Trekology Trek-Z 2.0 Trekking Poles
540 g

Budget foldable trekking poles with collapsible design weighing 1 lb 3 oz (540g) per pair for 100-120cm size, with EVA-foam handles.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Salomon MTN Carbon S3 vs Trekology Trek-Z 2.0 Trekking Poles: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Salomon MTN Carbon S3 wins — at 240 g it is 300 g (56%) lighter than the Trekology Trek-Z 2.0 Trekking Poles (540 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest trekking poles page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More trekking poles comparisons

Salomon MTN Carbon S3 vs Fizan Compact 3 Salomon MTN Carbon S3 vs Gossamer Gear FT3 Trekking Poles Salomon MTN Carbon S3 vs Leki Ultratrail FX.One Salomon MTN Carbon S3 vs Komperdell Carbon FXP UL Salomon MTN Carbon S3 vs Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Pole Salomon MTN Carbon S3 vs Freevane Kodiak Trekking Poles