← Gear database

Sawyer Micro Squeeze Water Filter vs ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket is the lighter option — 60 g lighter than the Sawyer Micro Squeeze Water Filter (56% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Sawyer Micro Squeeze Water Filter ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket
Weight 108 g · 0.108 kg · 0.24 lb 48 g · 0.048 kg · 0.11 lb
Brand Sawyer ULA Equipment
Category Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Sawyer Micro Squeeze Water Filter
108 g

Compact squeeze filter with 0.1-micron hollow fiber membrane. Filters up to 100,000 gallons lifetime and includes a backwash cleaning syringe.

Full details →
ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket
48 g

Magnetic closure shoulder strap pocket with exterior mesh for quick access storage.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Sawyer Micro Squeeze Water Filter vs ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket wins — at 48 g it is 60 g (56%) lighter than the Sawyer Micro Squeeze Water Filter (108 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest miscellaneous page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More miscellaneous comparisons