← Gear database

Sawyer Squeeze Water Filter System vs ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket is the lighter option — 37 g lighter than the Sawyer Squeeze Water Filter System (44% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Sawyer Squeeze Water Filter System ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket
Weight 85 g · 0.085 kg · 0.19 lb 48 g · 0.048 kg · 0.11 lb
Brand Sawyer ULA Equipment
Category Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Sawyer Squeeze Water Filter System
85 g

Versatile inline water filter with 0.1-micron absolute hollow-fiber membrane. Compatible with included squeeze pouches and standard hydration bladders.

Full details →
ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket
48 g

Magnetic closure shoulder strap pocket with exterior mesh for quick access storage.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Sawyer Squeeze Water Filter System vs ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the ULA Equipment Ultra Polarity Pocket wins — at 48 g it is 37 g (44%) lighter than the Sawyer Squeeze Water Filter System (85 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest miscellaneous page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More miscellaneous comparisons