← Gear database

Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 vs Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 is the lighter option — 970 g lighter than the Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 (43% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35
Weight 2,270 g · 2.270 kg · 5.00 lb 1,300 g · 1.300 kg · 2.87 lb
Brand Arc'teryx Fjallraven
Category Backpack Backpack
Arc'teryx Bora AR 63
2,270 g

Technical 63L pack with RotoGlide hipbelt for alpine approaches.

Full details →
Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35
1,300 g

Lightweight 35L hiking pack made with recycled G-1000.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 vs Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 wins — at 1,300 g it is 970 g (43%) lighter than the Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 (2,270 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 vs Gossamer Gear Elixir 20 Daypack Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 vs Gossamer Gear Murmur 36 Hyperlight Backpack Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 vs Salomon ADV Skin 12 Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 50L Arc'teryx Bora AR 63 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Backpack