← Gear database

Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L vs Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 is the lighter option — 15 g lighter than the Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L (1% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35
Weight 1,315 g · 1.315 kg · 2.90 lb 1,300 g · 1.300 kg · 2.87 lb
Brand Decathlon Fjallraven
Category Backpack Backpack
Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L
1,315 g

Affordable ultralight backpacking pack with 50L capacity plus 10L extension collar. Highly functional load lifters and large front pockets. Budget-friendly entr...

Full details →
Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35
1,300 g

Lightweight 35L hiking pack made with recycled G-1000.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L vs Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 wins — at 1,300 g it is 15 g (1%) lighter than the Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L (1,315 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L vs Gossamer Gear Elixir 20 Daypack Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L vs Gossamer Gear Murmur 36 Hyperlight Backpack Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L vs AONIJIE FH2522 22L Hiking Backpack Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L vs Salomon ADV Skin 12 Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack Decathlon Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10L vs Zpacks Nero Classic 50L