Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) is the lighter option — 450 g lighter than the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 (35% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.

Spec	Durston Kakwa 55 (2025)	Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35
Weight	850 g · 0.850 kg · 1.87 lb	1,300 g · 1.300 kg · 2.87 lb
Brand	Durston	Fjallraven
Category	Backpack	Backpack

Durston Kakwa 55 (2025)

850 g

55L ultralight thru-hiking pack in Ultra 200X fabric with tubular aluminum frame, carries up to 20kg comfortably.

Check price Full details →

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35

1,300 g

Lightweight 35L hiking pack made with recycled G-1000.

Full details →

Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) wins — at 850 g it is 450 g (35%) lighter than the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 (1,300 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Salomon ADV Skin 12 Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Zpacks Nero Classic 50L Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Zpacks Nero Classic Backpack Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Zpacks Nero Classic 40L Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Zpacks Nero Classic 30L