← All gear comparisons

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs Kuvik Compact Titanium Wood Stove

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Kuvik Compact Titanium Wood Stove is the lighter option — 16 g lighter than the Fire-Maple Blade 2 (12% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fire-Maple Blade 2 Kuvik Compact Titanium Wood Stove
Weight 135 g · 0.135 kg · 0.30 lb 119 g · 0.119 kg · 0.26 lb
Brand Fire-Maple Kuvik
Category Cooking Cooking
Fire-Maple Blade 2
135 g

Ultralight remote-canister stove with a copper preheat tube for steady high-output flame in freezing conditions. Outputs 2.8kW for cold-weather camping.

See it in your base weight → Full details →
Kuvik Compact Titanium Wood Stove
119 g

Ultra-compact titanium wood-burning stove weighing only 119g. Collapses to 0.2 inches thick for packability. Perfect for ultralight backpackers using natural wo...

See it in your base weight → Full details →

Building a pack? Add either one to your HikeLoad list, or drop its weight into the base weight calculator, and see what it does to your total weight.

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs Kuvik Compact Titanium Wood Stove: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Kuvik Compact Titanium Wood Stove wins — at 119 g it is 16 g (12%) lighter than the Fire-Maple Blade 2 (135 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest cooking page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More cooking comparisons