Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack is the lighter option — 1,011 g lighter than the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 (78% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.

Spec	Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35	Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack
Weight	1,300 g · 1.300 kg · 2.87 lb	289 g · 0.289 kg · 0.64 lb
Brand	Fjallraven	Zpacks
Category	Backpack	Backpack

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35

1,300 g

Lightweight 35L hiking pack made with recycled G-1000.

Full details →

Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack

289 g

Frameless ultralight backpack made from Dyneema Composite Fabric. Minimalist design for SUL hikers. Top-loading with roll-top closure.

Check price Full details →

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack wins — at 289 g it is 1,011 g (78%) lighter than the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 (1,300 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Salomon ADV Skin 12 Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 50L Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Backpack Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 40L Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 30L Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic