← All gear comparisons

Hoka Challenger 7 vs Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

No winner on weight yet. The recorded weights have not both been verified on the same basis. Size, included parts and single-item versus pair weights can differ. Check the linked sources before choosing a replacement.

Swipe to see all details.

Spec Hoka Challenger 7 Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe
Weight 275 g · 0.275 kg · 0.61 lb
as listed — one shoe or a pair, not yet confirmed
564 g · 0.564 kg · 1.24 lb
per pair (medium-sized pair)
Brand Hoka Saucony
Category Footwear Footwear
Hoka Challenger 7
275 g as listed

Versatile trail running shoe with moderate cushioning and aggressive lug pattern. Handles technical trails and hard-packed dirt with ease.

See it in your base weight → Full details →
Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe
564 g

Lightweight trail running shoe at 9.5oz per shoe. Enhanced traction with Vibram outsole and aggressive tread pattern.

See it in your base weight → Full details →

Building a pack? Add either one to your HikeLoad list, or drop its weight into the base weight calculator, and see what it does to your total weight.

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Hoka Challenger 7 vs Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe: which should you buy?

The listed weights alone are not enough to choose between these products. Confirm the size, included parts and weight basis against each source; choose equipment for the function and fit you need.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest footwear page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More footwear comparisons