← Gear database

The North Face Banchee 65 vs ULA Ohm 2.0

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

ULA Ohm 2.0 is the lighter option — 1,163 g lighter than the The North Face Banchee 65 (67% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec The North Face Banchee 65 ULA Ohm 2.0
Weight 1,730 g · 1.730 kg · 3.81 lb 567 g · 0.567 kg · 1.25 lb
Brand The North Face ULA
Category Backpack Backpack
The North Face Banchee 65
1,730 g

Ventilated 65L pack with FlexVent suspension system.

Full details →
ULA Ohm 2.0
567 g

Ultralight 50L frameless pack with framesheet option.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

The North Face Banchee 65 vs ULA Ohm 2.0: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the ULA Ohm 2.0 wins — at 567 g it is 1,163 g (67%) lighter than the The North Face Banchee 65 (1,730 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

The North Face Banchee 65 vs Gossamer Gear Elixir 20 Daypack The North Face Banchee 65 vs Gossamer Gear Murmur 36 Hyperlight Backpack The North Face Banchee 65 vs Salomon ADV Skin 12 The North Face Banchee 65 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack The North Face Banchee 65 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 50L The North Face Banchee 65 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Backpack