← Gear database

ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 30L

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Zpacks Nero Classic 30L is the lighter option — 266 g lighter than the ULA Ohm 2.0 (47% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec ULA Ohm 2.0 Zpacks Nero Classic 30L
Weight 567 g · 0.567 kg · 1.25 lb 301 g · 0.301 kg · 0.66 lb
Brand ULA Zpacks
Category Backpack Backpack
ULA Ohm 2.0
567 g

Ultralight 50L frameless pack with framesheet option.

Full details →
Zpacks Nero Classic 30L
301 g

Frameless ultralight backpack built with durable Ultra 100X fabric. Minimalist design for long-distance hikers prioritizing minimum pack weight.

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 30L: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Zpacks Nero Classic 30L wins — at 301 g it is 266 g (47%) lighter than the ULA Ohm 2.0 (567 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Gossamer Gear Elixir 20 Daypack ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Gossamer Gear Murmur 36 Hyperlight Backpack ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Salomon ADV Skin 12 ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 50L ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Backpack