← All gear comparisons

Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10 is the lighter option — 13 g lighter than the Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) (1% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10
Weight 893 g · 0.893 kg · 1.97 lb
size Medium (no Regular offered), Ultra 200X
880 g · 0.880 kg · 1.94 lb
Brand Durston Forclaz
Category Backpack Backpack
Durston Kakwa 55 (2025)
893 g

55L ultralight thru-hiking pack in Ultra 200X fabric with tubular aluminum frame, carries up to 20kg comfortably.

See it in your base weight → Full details →
Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10
880 g

Decathlon ultralight thru-hiking backpack with 50+10L capacity, roll-top closure and removable components for paring down trail weight.

See it in your base weight → Full details →

Building a pack? Add either one to your HikeLoad list, or drop its weight into the base weight calculator, and see what it does to your total weight.

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) vs Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Forclaz MT900 UL 50+10 wins — at 880 g it is 13 g (1%) lighter than the Durston Kakwa 55 (2025) (893 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons