← Gear database

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs LiteAF ECOPAK 30L Curve Frameless

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

LiteAF ECOPAK 30L Curve Frameless is the lighter option — 932 g lighter than the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 (72% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 LiteAF ECOPAK 30L Curve Frameless
Weight 1,300 g · 1.300 kg · 2.87 lb 368 g · 0.368 kg · 0.81 lb
Brand Fjallraven LiteAF
Category Backpack Backpack
Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35
1,300 g

Lightweight 35L hiking pack made with recycled G-1000.

Full details →
LiteAF ECOPAK 30L Curve Frameless
368 g

Ultralight frameless backpack made from 100% recycled polyester fabric; fully waterproof and durable

Full details →

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs LiteAF ECOPAK 30L Curve Frameless: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the LiteAF ECOPAK 30L Curve Frameless wins — at 368 g it is 932 g (72%) lighter than the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 (1,300 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons