Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Osprey Exos 48

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Osprey Exos 48 is the lighter option — 20 g lighter than the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 (2% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.

Spec	Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35	Osprey Exos 48
Weight	1,300 g · 1.300 kg · 2.87 lb	1,280 g · 1.280 kg · 2.82 lb
Brand	Fjallraven	Osprey
Category	Backpack	Backpack

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35

1,300 g

Lightweight 35L hiking pack made with recycled G-1000.

Full details →

Osprey Exos 48

1,280 g

Lightweight 48L thru-hiking pack with excellent ventilation.

Full details →

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Osprey Exos 48: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Osprey Exos 48 wins — at 1,280 g it is 20 g (2%) lighter than the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 (1,300 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Salomon ADV Skin 12 Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 50L Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Backpack Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 40L Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 30L