← All gear comparisons

Outdoor Vitals Carbon Evo 50 Backpack vs ULA Ohm 2.0

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

ULA Ohm 2.0 is the lighter option — 283 g lighter than the Outdoor Vitals Carbon Evo 50 Backpack (33% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Outdoor Vitals Carbon Evo 50 Backpack ULA Ohm 2.0
Weight 850 g · 0.850 kg · 1.87 lb
size Regular torso with M hip belt (30 oz)
 567 g · 0.567 kg · 1.25 lb
Brand Outdoor Vitals ULA
Category Backpack Backpack
Outdoor Vitals Carbon Evo 50 Backpack
850 g

Mid-sized pack with UltraStretch mesh front pocket and full suspension frame under 2 lbs.

See it in your base weight → Full details →
ULA Ohm 2.0
567 g

Ultralight 50L frameless pack with framesheet option.

See it in your base weight → Full details →

Building a pack? Add either one to your HikeLoad list, or drop its weight into the base weight calculator, and see what it does to your total weight.

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Outdoor Vitals Carbon Evo 50 Backpack vs ULA Ohm 2.0: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the ULA Ohm 2.0 wins — at 567 g it is 283 g (33%) lighter than the Outdoor Vitals Carbon Evo 50 Backpack (850 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

Outdoor Vitals Carbon Evo 50 Backpack vs Outdoor Vitals CS40 Ultra Outdoor Vitals Carbon Evo 50 Backpack vs Outdoor Vitals Shadowlight Carbon 60 Backpack