Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe vs Saucony Xodus Ultra 4
Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.
HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Same kind of shoe, so weight is a fair tiebreaker.
Both are trail running shoes. The Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe is 54 g a pair lighter than the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4.
What the extra 54 g of the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 buys you
- More cushioning under the heel (36 mm stack against 33 mm).
What the Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe offers besides the lower weight
- A lower list price at Alpinetrek: £136.95 against £149.95.
Weights are per pair as Alpinetrek lists them, usually for a medium size, so a few grams either way can come from the size they weighed. The other specs were checked on 19 October 2026 against Alpinetrek (Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe) and Alpinetrek (Saucony Xodus Ultra 4). "Not stated" means the source does not mention it, not that the shoe lacks it. List prices are the full price shown by that source, not a sale price; where sources disagree we show none.
Choose the Saucony Peregrine 16 Trail Running Shoe if…
…you move fast on trails, run some of it, and want the lightest and most flexible shoe; it gives little ankle support under a heavy pack.
Choose the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 if…
…you move fast on trails, run some of it, and want the lightest and most flexible shoe; it gives little ankle support under a heavy pack.
Building a pack? Add either one to your HikeLoad list, or drop its weight into the base weight calculator, and see what it does to your total weight.
See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest footwear page, or browse the full gear weight database.