ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Zpacks Nero Classic is the lighter option — 266 g lighter than the ULA Ohm 2.0 (47% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.

Spec	ULA Ohm 2.0	Zpacks Nero Classic
Weight	567 g · 0.567 kg · 1.25 lb	301 g · 0.301 kg · 0.66 lb
Brand	ULA	Zpacks
Category	Backpack	Backpack

ULA Ohm 2.0

567 g

Ultralight 50L frameless pack with framesheet option.

Full details →

Zpacks Nero Classic

301 g

Minimalist frameless DCF daypack ideal for ultralight hikers keeping baseweight under 10 lbs. Features roll-top closure and water-resistant Dyneema construction...

Check price Full details →

ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Zpacks Nero Classic wins — at 301 g it is 266 g (47%) lighter than the ULA Ohm 2.0 (567 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest backpack page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More backpack comparisons

ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Salomon ADV Skin 12 ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Ultra Backpack ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 50L ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic Backpack ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 40L ULA Ohm 2.0 vs Zpacks Nero Classic 30L