← All gear comparisons

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs Jetboil Stash Cooking System

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Fire-Maple Blade 2 is the lighter option — 66 g lighter than the Jetboil Stash Cooking System (33% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fire-Maple Blade 2 Jetboil Stash Cooking System
Weight 135 g · 0.135 kg · 0.30 lb 201 g · 0.201 kg · 0.44 lb
Brand Fire-Maple Jetboil
Category Cooking Cooking
Fire-Maple Blade 2
135 g

Ultralight remote-canister stove with a copper preheat tube for steady high-output flame in freezing conditions. Outputs 2.8kW for cold-weather camping.

See it in your base weight → Full details →
Jetboil Stash Cooking System
201 g

Integrated 0.8L titanium burner cooking system, 40% lighter than comparable Jetboil stoves, designed for ultralight backpacking.

See it in your base weight → Full details →

Building a pack? Add either one to your HikeLoad list, or drop its weight into the base weight calculator, and see what it does to your total weight.

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs Jetboil Stash Cooking System: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Fire-Maple Blade 2 wins — at 135 g it is 66 g (33%) lighter than the Jetboil Stash Cooking System (201 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest cooking page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More cooking comparisons