← All gear comparisons

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs Optimus Vega Stove

Weight and specs compared for 2026 — and which one to choose.

Fire-Maple Blade 2 is the lighter option — 43 g lighter than the Optimus Vega Stove (24% less weight). If grams matter to you, that is the one to beat.
shopping_cart Check today's price on Amazon
Spec Fire-Maple Blade 2 Optimus Vega Stove
Weight 135 g · 0.135 kg · 0.30 lb 178 g · 0.178 kg · 0.39 lb
Brand Fire-Maple Optimus
Category Cooking Cooking
Fire-Maple Blade 2
135 g

Ultralight remote-canister stove with a copper preheat tube for steady high-output flame in freezing conditions. Outputs 2.8kW for cold-weather camping.

See it in your base weight → Full details →
Optimus Vega Stove
178 g

Remote canister stove with windscreen. Ultra-lightweight 4-season dual mode camping stove.

See it in your base weight → Full details →

Building a pack? Add either one to your HikeLoad list, or drop its weight into the base weight calculator, and see what it does to your total weight.

HikeLoad is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Fire-Maple Blade 2 vs Optimus Vega Stove: which should you buy?

If saving weight is your priority, the Fire-Maple Blade 2 wins — at 135 g it is 43 g (24%) lighter than the Optimus Vega Stove (178 g). That said, the heavier option may justify the extra grams with more capacity, durability or comfort, so weigh the trade-off against how you'll use it.

See where both rank against everything else in this category on the lightest cooking page, or browse the full gear weight database.

More cooking comparisons